<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We&#8217;re Back! Gary rates 4 Australian Wines. &#8211; Episode #57</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/</link>
	<description>Wine news, tastings and reviews from the Wine Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 04:14:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andrew D</title>
		<link>http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/comment-page-2/#comment-703506</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/#comment-703506</guid>
		<description>Hey Gary

Fantastic to watch this old episode that was obviously a turning point.  I was thinking that the early editions of WLTV were a little soft.  Looking back in hindsight it&#039;s obvious you made the right decision.  Fantastic.

Oh and I agree about the Rosemont - worst winery in Australia!

Cheers
Andrew</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Gary</p>
<p>Fantastic to watch this old episode that was obviously a turning point.  I was thinking that the early editions of WLTV were a little soft.  Looking back in hindsight it&#8217;s obvious you made the right decision.  Fantastic.</p>
<p>Oh and I agree about the Rosemont &#8211; worst winery in Australia!</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Andrew</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John J.</title>
		<link>http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/comment-page-2/#comment-684768</link>
		<dc:creator>John J.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/#comment-684768</guid>
		<description>Could not agree with you more Gary about the Rosemount. I don&#039;t want to offend anyone, but Rosemount and those other mass marketed wines are a waste of time. The price you pay for those is not the quality of the wine, but the money they spend to mass-market that crap. There are far to many wines out there at that price or cheaper, which are way better values. Including that fruit driven, easy drinking style, and the more terroir driven, boutique style of wines from small producers. Surprised anyone would have wanted you to do a tasting on a wine like that. You can just google any of those mass marketed wines and get 1,000 reviews on them. I come to you because you turn us on to the good wines and good values out there that you don&#039;t here about at other places. Stuff that&#039;s not gonna have 1000 sites come up with info on it, like those silly wines such as Rosemount.
Which is why I really hope you get around to doing a charbono or vin jaune tasting. Very different wines, but underdogs in their own way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could not agree with you more Gary about the Rosemount. I don&#8217;t want to offend anyone, but Rosemount and those other mass marketed wines are a waste of time. The price you pay for those is not the quality of the wine, but the money they spend to mass-market that crap. There are far to many wines out there at that price or cheaper, which are way better values. Including that fruit driven, easy drinking style, and the more terroir driven, boutique style of wines from small producers. Surprised anyone would have wanted you to do a tasting on a wine like that. You can just google any of those mass marketed wines and get 1,000 reviews on them. I come to you because you turn us on to the good wines and good values out there that you don&#8217;t here about at other places. Stuff that&#8217;s not gonna have 1000 sites come up with info on it, like those silly wines such as Rosemount.<br />
Which is why I really hope you get around to doing a charbono or vin jaune tasting. Very different wines, but underdogs in their own way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dcpatton</title>
		<link>http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/comment-page-2/#comment-607927</link>
		<dc:creator>dcpatton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 01:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/#comment-607927</guid>
		<description>Awesome decision Gary! I think this was really when we all got hooked and WLTV took off! Bring the Thunder!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome decision Gary! I think this was really when we all got hooked and WLTV took off! Bring the Thunder!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Leavy</title>
		<link>http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/comment-page-2/#comment-415166</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Leavy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/#comment-415166</guid>
		<description>good episode to return with, you seemed much more comfortable.

word 57 &quot;the&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good episode to return with, you seemed much more comfortable.</p>
<p>word 57 &#8220;the&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJRice</title>
		<link>http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/comment-page-2/#comment-372646</link>
		<dc:creator>CJRice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/#comment-372646</guid>
		<description>My palate tells me that network television sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My palate tells me that network television sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John D.</title>
		<link>http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/comment-page-2/#comment-345452</link>
		<dc:creator>John D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 01:29:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/#comment-345452</guid>
		<description>Wow, this has to be a seminal episode.  I&#039;ve been going through the archives, one at a time from the beginning.  This one rocks.  I love pissed off and hardcore Gary.  I imagine it was a tough decision at the time Gary, and I am so glad you stuck to your  guns and flipped off the Man.  Way to go.  This is what folks like me need and crave.  Enough of the elitist BS.  We need honest, real advice.  If something sucks and there&#039;s something better, I want to hear it.  Keep up the great work Gary and thank you!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this has to be a seminal episode.  I&#8217;ve been going through the archives, one at a time from the beginning.  This one rocks.  I love pissed off and hardcore Gary.  I imagine it was a tough decision at the time Gary, and I am so glad you stuck to your  guns and flipped off the Man.  Way to go.  This is what folks like me need and crave.  Enough of the elitist BS.  We need honest, real advice.  If something sucks and there&#8217;s something better, I want to hear it.  Keep up the great work Gary and thank you!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristen</title>
		<link>http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/comment-page-2/#comment-258647</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/#comment-258647</guid>
		<description>Yay GV for keepin it real!!!!! I&#039;m so glad you didn&#039;t go into syndication and could keep you&#039;re unique tasting notes (&quot;well this doesn&#039;t suck&quot;) on the table! I can&#039;t imagine how many constraints there&#039;d be if you went with the big wigs! 

And I think this episode is the cusp of the Gary to come, the one who tells us those painting-like descriptions of wine! Thanks GV, I&#039;m so glad you stayed with vlogs. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay GV for keepin it real!!!!! I&#8217;m so glad you didn&#8217;t go into syndication and could keep you&#8217;re unique tasting notes (&#8221;well this doesn&#8217;t suck&#8221;) on the table! I can&#8217;t imagine how many constraints there&#8217;d be if you went with the big wigs! </p>
<p>And I think this episode is the cusp of the Gary to come, the one who tells us those painting-like descriptions of wine! Thanks GV, I&#8217;m so glad you stayed with vlogs. <img src='http://tv.winelibrary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Fanjestic</title>
		<link>http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/comment-page-2/#comment-220178</link>
		<dc:creator>The Fanjestic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/#comment-220178</guid>
		<description>Ok so watching these straight through - this is the beginning of the new WLTV. Gary&#039;s energy has picked up - the character that we all know and love in Gary is starting to shine through - what got into you Gary?  I think the idea that a 7 minute episode is long is funny. Boy do would those exec&#039;s be pissed now.  Or maybe WLTV will have another big change soon - who knows?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok so watching these straight through &#8211; this is the beginning of the new WLTV. Gary&#8217;s energy has picked up &#8211; the character that we all know and love in Gary is starting to shine through &#8211; what got into you Gary?  I think the idea that a 7 minute episode is long is funny. Boy do would those exec&#8217;s be pissed now.  Or maybe WLTV will have another big change soon &#8211; who knows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WA Ambassador</title>
		<link>http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/comment-page-2/#comment-110123</link>
		<dc:creator>WA Ambassador</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 21:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/#comment-110123</guid>
		<description>Australian wines... gooood, TV syndication... baaaad
Thanks for sticking with us and keeping it real.  This is way more valuable than what you could have offered on TV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australian wines&#8230; gooood, TV syndication&#8230; baaaad<br />
Thanks for sticking with us and keeping it real.  This is way more valuable than what you could have offered on TV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soyhead</title>
		<link>http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/comment-page-2/#comment-108010</link>
		<dc:creator>soyhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 13:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tv.winelibrary.com/2006/07/24/were-back-gary-rates-4-australian-wines-episode-57/#comment-108010</guid>
		<description>great episode.  obviously something went down.  lots of comments.  is this a pivotal wltv point?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great episode.  obviously something went down.  lots of comments.  is this a pivotal wltv point?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
