By: John J.

John J. — Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:01:56 +0000

qotd; anything from chateau-chalon

Gary, how about tackling a vin jaune episode?

By: thefanjestic

thefanjestic — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 05:37:50 +0000

It’s like watching the Microsoft crash only less embarrasing! Still pretty darn funny, and Gary always keeps his cool – but was he throwing bottles around afterwards?

By: SS Chris

SS Chris — Mon, 22 Jan 2007 22:00:43 +0000

Gary,

You should answer “ThomasS” comment(#435) on the air.

By: wine_goddess

wine_goddess — Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:49:34 +0000

nice job… would like to hear more about the history and vision of some of these wineries… perhaps, you can do a top 100 list for wines under $100!! =)

By: yoshi

yoshi — Mon, 22 Jan 2007 20:25:25 +0000

Great episode. I loved the behind the scenes.
Most comments ever on an episode?

By: Lawrence Leichtman

Lawrence Leichtman — Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:27:02 +0000

MAcGeek, love my new Intel Powerbook. Runs my Mac software like crazy and runs Vista (last beta copy) in parallel even better than my Dell (that is now for sale!). This is going to be hard going cold turkey on wine comments for 10 days. Hope the forums heat up somewhat.

By: Ken

Ken — Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:10:48 +0000

Gary,

I’m happy for you in that the live WLTV broadcast finally worked out after crashing.

Thanks for the gift of free shipping. I bought a few cellar defenders but I was bummed out that the Von Hovel Riesling you reviewed the other day was sold out by the time I ordered. It sounds fantastic and I’ll be looking for it.

Enjoy you vacation & thanks again.

By: ThomasS

ThomasS — Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:37:15 +0000

Gary, so bad I couldn’t join in for the live ep. Pitty, all that boring distraction from the real thing … .
Anyway, I have to tell you something: you know, you started with that remark on the Bordeaux 2005’s. Well, I wouldn’t say I don’t agree with you, but I’ve always tried not to forget to bring some home made criticism in the game here. I know all that jazz about the supply demand, market values, new commercial territory etc., it’s all true. Really, no question about that! Yet, what most people tend to forget (and often willingly tend to forget) is that our market has some kind of high level organisation in the stock market system, compared to the low level ‘everyday’ idea of the market. Both systems are interlinked by their fundamental way in dealing with the commercial AND the symbolical value of a given product. In the one system there’s more emphasis on the commercial, in the other more on the symbolical value. At least, that’s what it is actually designed for. And here is the problem with i.e. the Bordeaux market: symbolical value and commercial value are mixed, there’s no difference between both of them anymore (that’s right, I’m talking about difference, not about the essence of both values, because they don’t exist without differing from each other), they are egalized and equalized, which prevents them in an inevitable way to balance each other (follow me?). This balance in the commercial system (for the stock market, that’s something else, not being that important in the wine business, that is: the production part of the wine business, in this particular case), is embodied by the QPR, also a factor that’s determined by differences, available in the ranges of quality and commercial value. Yet, when commercial value equals symbolical value … the commercial value and the quality of this or that wine are discursively equalized (discursively! That is NOT virtually) which, to my opinion, is really something most people (in wine business or just as wine lovers) easily like to forget, when it comes to price changes in the wine market. And yes, to put it in a very simplistic way: when quality equals commercial value equals symbolical value, there is no ‘difference’ anymore, … the sole prerequisite for QPR. Now, of course it’s not that bad, we are not as far as that, but it’s an element that’s very active in for instance the wine consumers mind. Think about Southern France: wines are seen as of low quality, why? Partly because the prices are low, causing the producers to become part of a downward spiral … Of course, WE now that there are terrific wines produced in that area … but how small a bunch of players are we on the market? How small is the group of wine lovers that really seek out what’s in the bottle and not on the price tag? Think about that! It’s a very small group, literally of no IMPORTance.
There is of course the fact that there is a limited production, that there are more consumers playing on the market, … but this discursive jinx is something that’s never taken into account (because it’s to difficult to put into numbers, I am aware of that, BUT, is THAT a reason???! Think about it, and think i.e. about what happened 80 years ago! Read about the forebodes …). Why not? Obviously because it questions the whole system and is a fairly complex thing (hey, no, I’m not a complot theory believer, I’m just serious about the way the market, the market discourse works). That’s what’s going on with Bordeaux recently, has always been going on with Burgundy and Champagne, and that’s what causes the prices not to drop according to the relative outcome of the vintage in se (compare 2001 to 2000, i.e.).
This is one of the reasons why I am positively appalled by the price raisings in Bordeaux: they have nothing to do anymore with scarceness, inherent quality, … it’s all about this cancereous outgrowth of marketing discourse (don’t worry I’m a marketing guy to, so it’s not the marketing business I’m aiming at), having inevitable consequences for marketing in se, but also for the wine business. So, I really don’t believe there is a (market-)CORRECTION going on here, whatever you mean with that. What will be the eventual outcome of this … I don’t know. The only thing I know is that I have been much more restrained in buying my cases 2005’s (Lagrange, LÃ©oville Barton, Haut-Brion and some others). Not because they are not ok, or not because they are all overpriced, or all that crap … No, just because there is something about this valuation egalisation I really want to stand up against: I just try to prevent my own palate from being influenced by this very aggressive wine marketing discourse.
Just consider this: what about the QPR of for instance 2004/2005 Ausone and 2004/2005 LÃ©oville Barton (just make abstraction of the cru-system, because that’s a parameter of symbolical value here, and in it’s overpowering the QPR, is the problem here)? Huh? I don’t think so, if you follow me … . Something more? What about the competition with other wines (i.e. Cali Cabs, SA Cab/merl/pv/…)? Huh? Why isn’t there anything visible of that in here? I know why, if you follow me in what I said, I am sure you’ll think the same … . So, changing the wine world is for me in the first place being aware of wine discourse and being able to distinguish the difference covered up by that particular discourse. Pensive guy? Yes I am! And when I’m not I really enjoy my coke .
Go on man! You make people question, that’s the only way to go …
QOTD: server down? An almost 100% carignan, Aux Temps d’Histoire from Domaine du Grand d’Arc. Orangette with chocolate, dark, dark, melancholy wine, bittersweet fruits, jasmine and all that. Indescribable.
C ya.

By: Deano

Deano — Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:51:25 +0000

Hey Gary I am upset that I had to miss the live episode. I was in monterey CA drinking some wine and relaxing. I drank some Ventana from Monterey. It was a 2003 CAB and it was pretty good. I poured a glass and looked at my fiance and said this one is for Gary since I cant see him live LOL I will be there for the next live episode though. I hope you have a good time on vacation. I will not know what to do without the episodes for that long lol. Well catch you later.

By: Susan

Susan — Mon, 22 Jan 2007 03:14:55 +0000

More than 432 comments!
What can I say?
Gary- don’t think you are lacking for comments on this ep!

Comments on: Wine Library TV Live! (Rebroadcast) – Episode #170