90 Point Wine Values – Episode #248

June 4, 2007

Gary Vaynerchuk tastes 4 wines scored 90 points by Parker, Spectator, Wine Enthusiast ect and are under $20.

Comments on this episode(297) Leave a comment ›

“QOTD: Either format works for me. However, have you considered doing m…” by dcpatton
“QOTD: I don’t oppose either, but favor the new wines. (new to you, the…” by Mikeeeee
View all 297 ›

Wines tasted in this episode:

2005 Trevor Jones Virgin ChardonnayAustralian Chardonnay
2003 Silverado MerlotNapa Merlot
2005 Zabrin AttecaOther Spanish Red Wine
2005 Marquis Philips Sarah’s BlendAustralian Red Meritage

Links mentioned in todays episode.

Vayniac wristband email

Having trouble viewing this video? Try the Quicktime version.

297 Responses

June 4, 2007

TD
Great topic, just what I need!
June 4, 2007

wtvLurker
qotd: i like the current format where you pan some and like others.
you can always throw in wines or whole episodes where u stack the deck with wines you’ve had, like and expect will show well.
June 4, 2007

Rob B.
top 5!!!!!
Great topic. always have liked Silverado.
June 4, 2007

MaryS
Top 5 too!!!
June 4, 2007

Susan
Gary-I couldn’t figure out where to make comments?
Strange?????
June 4, 2007

portland guy
top 100? good value wines episode is a must.
June 4, 2007

Leigha33w
Top 10. Appreciate the hard work and good topic
June 4, 2007

brooklyni
thanks for doin this one!
June 4, 2007

Kevin Warner
QOTD – I like the format of the show now. I don’t think you change it.

wtvLurker I think hit it on the nose. I agree with him.
June 4, 2007

hinrgman
Sometimes my palate doesn’t agree with the ratings
June 4, 2007

Tom (vtjones)
QOTD: I enjoy your candid reactions so I would not want you to do only shows where you tell us about wines you tasted but one episode every two weeks or so or maybe once a week have one episode with 2 wines you recommend would be cool. Keep up the great work my wife and I really dig the show. We also owe you a picture of a wrist band and it is coming I swear.
June 4, 2007

sfgiants55
I think you have to do both. If you’ve tasted a wine that you love and want to show the world it, you should. That’s what the forums do no?

However, it’s also great seeing wines you’ve never had. We get a good in depth analysis on the fly. Ever better if you do them blind…

Just my 2cents
June 4, 2007

Jon B.
Interesting… seems the 90 pts. were being thrown around a little loosely QOTD Gary I love the show the way it is. I fear that if you have tried the wines before the show we would lose your first reaction and in my opinion that has created some the funniest moments on wltv.. Please don’t change anything.If people want to see or hear about what you’ve been drinking they need to check it out on cork’d.
June 4, 2007

MikeyB
qotd: gotta keep it interesting for you, or else why do it? so, i say stick with majority wines you want to taste but taste one you know is good every day or two. my humble opinion…
June 4, 2007

Jeffrey
quotd: Maybe on the Friday on the couch episodes, feature a wine that you think is a good deal?
June 4, 2007

Tom T.
Agree with you that wine can be too sugar-fied.
QOTD….I like the current format a lot, but if you have a wine that’s “bringing the Thunder”, then you should bring it on the show. I’d say just re-taste it after doing the usual show/format.
June 4, 2007

CraigV
Enjoyed the episode, as usual, but I am a little confused. When you say a wine is ‘a little to sugarfied’ are you referring to actual residual sugar in the wine ? Is it off-dry or even slightly sweet ? Or is it just too ripe or too fruity, but still fermented dry ?

QOTD: Guess I am a fence sitter. I like the format the way it is, but would have no objections to hearing about wines you have recently enjoyed (or hated).
June 4, 2007

DK44
Good episode. I agree with most of the previous posters. You spontaneous reactions are a key part of the show.

Let’s change the wine world, not the show format!
June 4, 2007

portland guy
QOTD – Sort of on the fence, on this one. And it’s a picket fence, hooowhoooo –
Would prefer a slight change in format, perhaps adding 1 wine that you have liked and can recommend, to the mix of 2 to 4 wines that you have yet to try.
June 4, 2007

TD
I like the current set up. If everything was a pre-appoved recommendation, we wouldn’t see the the pazzzes, which are an essential part of changing the wine world, aren’t they?

It comes down to this: in a more premeditated system, will we still get descriptions of wines that you may not appreciate? I’m thinking of the Atteca from this show for instance.

And thanks again for the TNs. My list is getting longer!
June 4, 2007

patrill
I like the current format, but it would be nice to hear about a wine you fell in love with recently, especially if it’s a good value. I think you’ve done that before, so maybe you can just mix it up now and then with some wines you’ve already tried.
June 4, 2007

Bruty
QOTD: The current format is great. Having said that – it would be nice to hear about a wine or two that you enjoy every other week or so
June 4, 2007

Karl Laczko
Late today, but hey, you’re in Italy so does it really matter. I love it when parents call you in the middle of something, classic “real life moment”.

Nice wines, more impressed that you still don’t look wasted – waiting for the next few days to see when you finally crack!

QOTD – No change, I love the thought that you’re getting to these wines new and that your reactions are real, good or bad, not open to “influence” from previous experience or tasting notes.
June 4, 2007

Adam Altman
BLIND TASTING EPISODE(s)!!!!!

QOTD – I like the current format, some you have tried and some you haven’t, depending on the day. I feel if it was all one and none of the other it wouldn’t work. I think one “blind” day a week would be a really cool twist to what you already do.
June 4, 2007

SP
QOTD:

Current format is good. Need to find out about the good wines as well as the bad wines. Also might get a little political if you start only tasting wines you line/enjoy have had recently.

my two cents!
June 4, 2007

lifestooshort
QOTD: Dude, does it have to be one or the other? Why not do both? Current approach totally works, but people wanna know what the Vary Gaynerchuk unit has quaffed. Yeah, do ‘em both; mix it up. Hope you’re diggin’ the land of the Piazza; it’s raining and nasty here in VT, and as a soon to be married guy, I’m bummin’ about the two bottles of Sarah’s blend I have sitting in the cellar! Meh. Because Yo! is a little bit of Oy! spelled backwards. . . !
June 4, 2007

Neil
QOTD: If it ain’t broke why fix it? The current format works just fine otherwise it might become an ifomercial. If the show’s authenticity comes into question people will start to tune out the message.

Once in an email you sent over a show featuring a Hartwig special deal or the gift baskets. That’s okay and who doesn’t like a good pitch, but WLTV should be spontaneous and fun. If you aren’t having fun who else is going to?

That said, who picks the wines in the first place? Viewers?? Staff??? Dad???? Lizzy?????
June 4, 2007

geespot
Gary, love the way the show is now but wouldn’t be opposed to seeing you bring some pre-tasted wines in.

About today’s ep, I’m still having a little trouble with rating the sugarfied over-the-top bombs as low as you do. You say they’re delicious so are you just rating them based on your feelings towards this trend in wine or are you actually rating them based on the overall experience they give you? It’s like a guilty pleasure to drink these ‘fake’ wines. On one hand, they’re really yummy, on the other hand, you feel guilty for liking them because on some level you ‘know’ that wine isn’t ’supposed’ to taste like these do. That guilty feeling about the fakeness is what makes me rate them low in my personal journal. I feel these wines put me between a rock and a hard place, do you suppose Parker has just decided to throw conventional thinking away and rate them high solely because they’re yummy? I’m not sure where I’m going with this, I just wanted to see if we’re on the same page.
June 4, 2007

Nathan
Great format the way it is, but I agree with Mr. Altman; a blind tasting every now and again would be interesting. I try to blind as much as I can, as it’s really helped me to exercise my palate. My business partner and I brown bag wines and have the other try to pick out the varietal(s), country, region, etc. In your case, it would be nice if there was a way for us to interact with your blind tastings. Ah, it’s getting too complicated; you’ve got a great show the way it is. Enjoy Italy, Greece, etc.
June 4, 2007

Pastore
Alright, already!! I’m a lurker. Not because I don’t love the show, because it is fan-frakin-tastic, but because I work two jobs, and don’t have a ton of time. Wanted to say I’ve been watching off and on for about a year now, and this is by far the best thing that has happened to wine, ever! I bartend part-time at a country club, so I have the added bonus of being able to try a lot of different types of really quality wine.

I like the current format because your reactions are, at times, priceless! Don’t think it would be the same on wines you already have a good feel for. Keep up the good work!
June 4, 2007

Chris B
I think a mix of the current style with your recommendations would work out well. Perhaps one or two shows a week, or just mix them in with wines that you haven’t tried before? (current format)

Chris
June 4, 2007

Fco.
Good show, three of those fours I will make an attempt to try. The wife likes the sweeter stuff so I mostly marked them down for her. QOTD: No man! Keep it the way it has been. I agree with Tom and Lurker and Kevin and those guys, what you have going is good, but if you want to share some of the wines recently tested, then like that one guy said, maybe once a week, or once every two weeks. But right now, your show is good stuff.
June 4, 2007

RuralTom
Greeting Mr V!

Q of the D: PLEASE, don’t change the format of your show. Let us, your loyal and attentive audience, experience the tasting with you. My personal fear is that the show would change from a wonderful educational tool and my most happily anticipated entertainment of my week to a shameless sales show. Keep the integrity, honesty, and excitement we’ve come to love!… We’ll be drinking and enjoying wines without a “hard sell”
June 4, 2007

thabeav
QOTD: KEEP THE FORMAT!!!…..BUT…add some blind tastings. Also, how about a “taste along with Gary” once per month. You send out a list of wines at the beginning of the month. We go buy them and taste them while watching the episode at the end of the month. It would be a great way to compare palates.
June 4, 2007

mbannon
I enjoy the current format because I love it when you hit on a “surprise” whether good or bad. But, I have to admit, when you occasionally do episodes highlighting recent favorites, I tune in just as enthusiastically. I guess what I’m saying is that you’re Da Bomb no matter what you do!! Just don’t go changin.
June 4, 2007

Billy G
I like the show as it is. There are plenty of recommendation sources. The surprise element best exhibited by the GV face while tasting makes the show.
June 4, 2007

CooGAR
QOTD: Gotta agree with a previous poster…..do both!!
June 4, 2007

Michael Goldfine
Hi Gary,

I am answering the question whether I prefer you tasting wines for the first time or not. My answer is mix up and I don’t care because . . . What I want is for you to educate me and you can do that best either way. It certainly would be good to taste wines you have tasted recently or know real well in order to promote a theme whether it be an odd ball grape or a new country or malolaction. Keep up the good work.

I love the shows on value.

Cheers,
Michael
June 4, 2007

IanY
I agree with the comments above which suggested that it’s the spontaneity of your reactions that makes wltv interesting to watch. Good episode!
June 4, 2007

thabeav
the ABC article says that 20,000 tune in everyday. Hmmmm 300 comments, 19,700 lurkers??

20,000 – really? wow!
June 4, 2007

damon aka unknownwine
I like spontaneous reactions with the wines you haven’t had in a while and appreciate the ocassional show where you feel you have to share a particularly special wine with us…like you’re been doing all along. Enjoy yourself. We’re here to keep you happy. Really.
damon aka unknownwine
June 4, 2007

countnocount
QOTD: Don’t fix what ain’t broke! Stick with the current format.
June 4, 2007

ChrisR
I love it when you get surprised, and when you review a wine that you’ve had before, unless it’s something really special that you want to share with us, I would prefer if you go with wines that you haven’t had.
June 4, 2007

Brett
I like the current format where it feels like we are discovering wines together. That being said, since I am new to wine I feel that there are many good ones out there that I am missing out on because they are too common for you to review. If I have to pick a side to the fence though, I’d say you should keep doing what you’re doing.
June 4, 2007

John Blue Label
GV,
Hope you are having fun on the trip. No real knockouts today, huh?
QOTD: I would prefer mostly untasted wines, but when you get some that you really like, you should share them with us, because sharing is nice!!!
June 4, 2007

jorge
Glad to see Silverado doing it right again.
QOTD= Out of the four wines, do two in the current fashion, one that you have tasted and liked, and the fourth one from the Vayniacs’ request. That will cover all angles. I like the way you are doing it right now, but sometimes, they are all sucky, and you feel like you got nothing out of the show. By doing one that you previously tasted, we will have something for sure. Doing one from the requests you get, will add that user satisfaction and will make us feel like we have a direct input into the show.
June 4, 2007

Billman
QOTD: both! But I also really enjoyed the blind tasting episode(s).
June 4, 2007

Cam
QOTD: I love the current format, but maybe you could mix it up a bit for people who’d rather have recommendations. Either do two regular, spontaneous tastings and two recommendations, or do some shows with one or the other format.
June 4, 2007

Lb in KS
QOTD: I like the way it’s done now. However………..one show every so often where you throw out those that you REALLY, REALLY like.
June 4, 2007

yowens44
Nice show Gary. QOTD: For me, I like the show the way it is. I watch the show to learn about wines, regions, styles, etc. And yes, occasionally when you go off on how incredible a wine is I’ll track it down, usually thru WL . The show would not be as interesting to me if it was just about wines you liked and are recommending. Just my two pennies!!!
June 4, 2007

Slappy
QOTD: Both sides of da fence brotha. I think the occasional recommendation from the vaynermaster would be nice. I think it could be easily overdone, but sometimes the wines go on losing streaks like some well known football teams. Great show. Wish i was in Venice again.
June 4, 2007

Chris George
If you enjoy doing it the current way then that’s exactly what you should carry on doing. Nobody would be around to comment if it didn’t work. People should figure out what’s good for themselves, watching you do the same thing is all the education we need.
Cheers Gary
June 4, 2007

plminer
QOTD: How about a balance of the two? Some episodes are recommendations and some are first time tastings. But all in all I have no problem with the format as is.
June 4, 2007

PhilB
QOTD: Stick with the way is show is right now… It’s the best cause it represents how we buyers act towards wine… Yes, we buy stuff that we’ve had in the past and know we like, but we also got out and try wine we’ve never before to see what they’re like… There is always a first time anyway!
Enjot Europe as much as it deserves it!
June 4, 2007

maggiej
QOTD: Keep it how it is- though you could always make side comments (instead of full reports) on recent tastings, i.e. “if you like this wine, you’ll like…”

Side Comment: I love ordering from WL because of the great selection and prices BUT I hate getting all that styrafoam used for shipping. Maybe consider more recycleable shipping materials? Save the earth while changing the wine world
June 4, 2007

PhilB
QOTD: Stick with the way is show is right now… It’s the best cause it represents how we buyers act towards wine… Yes, we buy stuff that we’ve had in the past and know we like, but we also got out and try wine we’ve never before to see what they’re like… There is always a first time anyway!
Enjoy Europe as much as it deserves it!
June 4, 2007

Annapolitan
QOTD: Gary, keep it the way it is.I appreciate your honest reactions to the wines.
June 4, 2007

TSchampaert
That Spanish Grenache looked like a true stunner, pity it didn’t liven up.
QOTD: keep going on like this. Better to be surprised and uninformed when you taste.
June 4, 2007

Matt W
You guys decrease the audio bit rate on this one? It doesn’t sound as good as the others.
June 4, 2007

Jessica L.
Love the current format. Would be great if you compared your favorite wine of the random picks (the unknowns) to one you have enjoyed recently (a known). Best wine tutorial I have ever seen, tons better than dealing with the schmos at tastings who either read from a book or I wish they had. Beautiful nose for the wine too, makes me want to open a bottle with you.
June 4, 2007

Shir-Az
Gary,

You lost me a little on this one. How is it that a chardonnay that doesn’t see any oak (hence the name “virgin”) is “over oaked”???
June 4, 2007

Shadowbird
QOTD: I actually think a mix would be better. Keep it as it is, but throw in recommendations every now and again. Otherwise, don’t change a thing, Gary.
June 4, 2007

Herm
Thanks for doing another great show….I like it the way it is….based on the comments that I’ve read, so do most of those who comment….however if a good number of your fans want a show like that, why not “give it a whirl”….
June 4, 2007

Sue Z.
I’m with you Shadowbird! Keep it mostly “old school” with a little “new world” thrown in every once in a while:-)
June 4, 2007

Corvette Tony
QOTD: Gary, keep the format just the way it is. I prefer having to taste wines that you’ve not had.
June 4, 2007

JamesN.
QOTD..
I think that these requests are from viewers that want great wines for small bones. I am one of these viewers! But I enjoy your excitment and intensity when trying new wines. I feel that the show would loose “THE EDGE” if you changed the format to please the wine shoppers looking for a sure thing when purchasing wine, It’s like anything else, take a chance, and win or loose keep in mind, drinking wine is relaxing, enjoyable, expermentation, and most of all fun! Nobody needs to hit a home run every time we pop a cork, or unscrew a cap. I like to avoid dissapointment when opening a bottle of wine, but it happens to all of us.
June 4, 2007

JackHammer
I think the Virgin is unoaked?
June 4, 2007

Orion Slayer
Gary, WineLibraryTV is so varied it never ceases to deliver. Episodes like this are great because I can see wines in my price level that I might like. I don’t learn so much about a rare variatal or a region I’ve never heard of, but that’s for another day. Thanks for a great variety of shows!

QOTD: I would enjoy if you featured one wine that you have already tasted and recommend, but a whole show would be too much.
June 4, 2007

GottaGoDrink
QOTD- I like the show the way it is. It’s fun to watch you taste wines you don’t like, too. If I knew all the wines were chosen because you like them, I wouldn’t really need to watch…half-kidding.

Great show today. A lot of the MP Sarah’s Blend gets drank in my crowd, although I am less wild about it than most. Cheers!
June 4, 2007

Jay
QOTD: I think the show format is great and you guys should keep up the excellent work. The only thing I would suggest you add would be something along the lines of “An under the radar show” every once in a while. What I mean by this is to feature an area like Greece, Egypt or an area like Temecula, CA, which not to many people know about but are wine producing regions that are trying to put out some good efforts.

Thanks

Jay
June 4, 2007

Ferrigno
QOTD: Leave as it is, discovering a good or bad wine along with you is the best BTW I would REALLY love to see a lot more shows that focus on areas of the world or grapes (like what youve done with albariÃ±o, riesling, etc) than “THE NEW SUPER BARGAIN 9 WINES UNDER 5 BUCKS” style of episode BUT THATS ONLY ME THOUGHS
June 4, 2007

JC
Yeah, leave it.
June 4, 2007

FredinNYC
QOTD: This is not really an answer to your QOTD, but an alternate suggestion. I’m sure I’m not the only one who has been disappointed in a wine which got a very high rating (95+) from WS, RP, et al. Perhaps you could do a show on some of these 95+ and tell us what YOU think. Do they deserve the rating or not?
June 4, 2007

Elliot Essman
Your honest true reaction most of the time with an occasional heads up.
June 4, 2007

napaspa.com
Anyone else having a terrible time viewing these episodes recently?
June 4, 2007

E-Rock
QOTD = Don’t change a thing the show works the way it is. The occassional show on your personal recomendations is nice though.
June 4, 2007

Joe
Gary, I like the method for the show as is…that is, where you have not yet tried the wines you are about to review. I love the spontaneous and viceral reaction you have when you put that unknown wine into your mouth. Please keep it up!

Once again, marquis phillips sucks. The most heavily overrated wine since Silver Oak,
Joe
June 4, 2007

napaspa.com
Buffering…… Buffering…… Buffering…… Buffering…… Buffering…… Buffering…… Buffering…… Buffering…… Buffering……
June 4, 2007

Ralph Rocco
Hi Gary,

I like the method as. Please keep up WL TV!!
June 4, 2007

Rempshaker
Two a day should be max, dude….this show is losing the funny lines for me to rip for my recap! LOL!!

Leave us hanging next time…its only 10 days!
June 4, 2007

PeterT
QOTD: Keep it the way it is. You can always mentioned you had a great bottle of… while dining out recently. Keep it fresh for you and more than likely it will come off fresh for us Vaniacs!!!!
June 4, 2007

Rempshaker
Oh, keep show format as is…you oanning a wine with no regard is AWESOME!!
June 4, 2007

tomfar
QOTD – I really think the surprise element is key to the success of the show. Previously reviewed wines wouldn’t be as interesting and would add some of those pre-conceptions that are part of the UNchanged wine world. There is the possibility that WLTV critics would accuse you of shilling vs. coming in open-minded, too.
June 4, 2007

Zucchetti - Making the web work » Video tagging
[...] was on the wine library TV a few days ago and whilst watching “90 Point Wine Values – Episode #248” and I saw these small circles on the video time line. I curiously hovered over them and was [...]
June 4, 2007

David M Roberts
Looking back at the episodes already produced, there is a good balance of some themed shows (love the decanting episode), along with plenty of simple “let’s try these new wines together” shows.

My rec is: mix it up as you’ve been doing; crack open some new wines you’ve never tried, but also showcase some favorite bottles and highlight those known deals and picks you have. There’s room for both.

Viewers love the from-the-hip shooting the show provides, but I think we also look to you as an experienced enthusiast who has some good thoughts to impart, and who has tried more wines than most of us.

Cheers,
June 4, 2007

KenP
Good ep.
QOTD: I am in agreement with most. The show works better as an exploration of wines than one of straightforward recommendations. Gotta have the pazzzzzz! Maybe every Friday you could discuss both a wine and a food pairing combo. Fire up the hibachi in the parking lot!
June 4, 2007

Paul M
QOTD: Like the idea of a little of both styles of show.
June 4, 2007

half century
I’m with wtvlurker. keep this format and stack the deck occassionally. ENJOY VENICE! can’t wait to hear about the italians you’re trying.
June 4, 2007

SoCal
G,
Have fun on your trip!
QOTD: Do change a thing. I prefer the current format
June 4, 2007

slambert
Gary, nice episode.

I would agree with wtvlurker, the format should stay the same. I love the candid approach and feel to the show. Then throw in an episode every once in a while like the one you did with wines “That Brought The Thunder”…or is that Thunnndaaaarrrr (the barbarian).

Hope you enjoy the trip.
June 4, 2007

CC_HTown
QOTD: I agree with your approach about tasting wines that you have not tasted yet. It keeps it new for you as well as entertaining for us. BUT…every now and then I would like to see an episode where you know the wines are good to you for a specific price point or area. You could do an episode where you choose the top 4 best bargain wines or top 4 best wines under $8 or top $40 wine from the Rhone if you wanted to splurge etc etc. To complete these shows you would have to have prior knowledge of the wines before taping.

All of these suggestions aside, you obviously are doing something right because many of us have watched all of the 248 episodes and we continue to watch unless you start to really suck a nut.

Keep it up, G!

CC
June 4, 2007

Kevin K
QOTD: I love the format of the show, but I think if you changed it up every now and then it would work. Kinda like when the wife gets a new outfit…
June 4, 2007

SSV
Love the show…keep them coming.

Salud!
June 4, 2007

njjim
The great thing about this whole thing is that every once in awhile we get a littlittle piece of GV’s life. Today, for example, GV Dad’s call. Over time we’ll get more pieces of the puzzle and a fuller picture will appear. Love it.
June 4, 2007

Oregon Sipper
QOTD: I would agree with CC and others that have said in one way or another to keep on keeping on, but it is nice to see some of those “themed” episodes like best Merlots under $5.00…ect (haha)

However, I still think the best avenue for your personal tastings outside the show is corkd. That way those that are really interested in what you are drinking with dinner..or breakfast can find out and see your notes.

Hey, then maybe once a month you can do something similar to the blogcast that the three wine guys do and just give us a taste of what you are drinking in the real world.

Stay real! Peace out!
June 4, 2007

wm mole
Nice show! and cameo from Dad! that was great. The sugar issue is huge(literally) for me. I watched “Supersize Me” recently and they said the guy ended up going thru “30+ pounds of sugar” in the month he was on the Mac diet.
Shouldn’t we be feeding this to our cars instead of ourselves? I’m not a winemaker but believe sugar in wine(dry reds?) is considered to be a flaw from 1:incomplete or “stuck” fermentation, 2: creation of mannitol(a sugar used to cut street drugs) or 3: “Americanization” of wine(adding sugar)OMG! I don’t like any of these scenarios.

QOTD:I don’t read wine spectator, ethusiast, or wine freak journal, but I do talk to friends and shop owners. They say:”tastes great, excellent, not too sweet, bargain good deal, you’ve got to try this one”. I wish I could taste most wines before buying but obviously can’t so Gary fills this gap… beyond my wildest expectations! These shows have been so much fun I don’t mind being pitched to a little. Also, what’s the sense in hearing about a great wine if you can’t even get it?
June 4, 2007

Douglas
Hi Gary! Let’s keep the show the way you have it now, it seems more fun and fair that way, so that no one would accuse you of pushing a particular wine at WL. The idea that you could pazzzzz on a wine immediately available at your store is one reason I stick around for every new episode!

Douglas aka demilove
June 4, 2007

Michael Palmer
QOTD: I am a fence sitter. I like both ways and for you to mix it up as such Gary. You do a great job of keeping it fresh and interesting. Thanks!
June 4, 2007

C.W. Miller IV
A(nswer)ofD: Like many here I would prefer that the show stay in its current format with the occasional “themed” episode where you bust off big-time, Gary V recommendations.
June 4, 2007

C.W. Miller IV
A(nswer)otD: Like many here I would prefer that the show stay in its current format with the occasional “themed” episode where you bust off big-time, Gary V recommendations.
June 4, 2007

kingfunk
keep it the way it is, but every now and then you could throw on a wine that you drank at home and thought was pretty good.
June 4, 2007

brooklyni
QOTD: keep it the way it is. I like your advice and the fun you have on the show. But if I were looking for a shopping list to be spoonfed I’d clip out that sheet that Wine Spectator gives you. We don’t need that crap. Just a fun, laid back time with some good (and sometimes not so good) wines. Thanks bro.
June 4, 2007

Crouch
Hey, Gary V, continue to keep it real. Love the show format as it is.
June 4, 2007

J Crazy
QOTD: Change a thing and I’ll crush. Seriously, I’ll fly to the Dirty Jerz and start crushing. This website is about learning, changing, fun, spontaneity, friends, and enjoying wines the way they are supposed to be enjoyed. As MANY have said, if I want boring “this is what we like” garbage I’ll watch WS wine review videos (although I like the spots they’re doing on biodynamics). We get to join and participate the best when you’re enjoying yourself and when you are partner with us in trying something new. I know people may see you as a teacher of sorts and we all learn a *&)! load by watching this vinblog. BUT, I think most of us don’t want it to feel like a classroom. “Here’s what I drank. It was good…It was crap. The end.” C’mon, where’s the fun and excitement in that. Sure, if you tried something and feel that people must know to buy or not buy or try it that’s one thing. But yo, we love ya but don’t need to know what you’re doing 24/7. Save your family time to enjoy wine unfettered by concern with how you’ll present it on the show, etc. Big ups! Cuz we’re changing the wine world.
June 4, 2007

Winodontist
Gary,
Nice QPR on some of those wines today, great to see.

QOTD: I am one who truly loves the show, but would enjoy seeing you do wines you’ve tasted recently. Not every episode, but maybe 2-3 times per month. I have gotten lots of emails from you saying you’re not in this to sell wine, and I honestly believe you, but don’t let the fear of coming off as a “wine seller” keep you from actually recommending some wines you enjoy from the store. We know you are true to your audience!
June 4, 2007

jack mulgrew
Gary is Fantastic!!!
June 4, 2007

MikeBro
Great show as always, quick and to the point. Thanks

QOTD: I agree with most of all the comments, keep it the way it is, but every now and then throw in some wines that you like.

Save Journeys,

MB
June 4, 2007

DS
QOTD–WLTV has become what it is based on the current format. Ditching that would be foolish. That said, one episode in 10 (every other Friday?) devoted to some of your current favorites would be a nice tweak.
DS
June 4, 2007

Madrone
Keep the show the way it is. If you need another show that recommends wine that you already know, then produce a second show or help someone else do it. Also, the great secret in the wine industry is the billion or so wines scored by the big shots at 85-89. You should do a show on WS or RP 89s. Every retail customer that sees a score or shelf talker at 90: they buy (and the producers change prices that year or the next). If they see an 89 they (generally) walk past it. But since we know that scores are more or less BS that means that there are some awesome buys scored in the high 80s. Lets pop the score bubble by celebrating super high quality wines in that 89 range!
June 4, 2007

amgryger
QOTD: I enjoy the show the way it is because there is something really honest in its spontanaeity (sp?). Also, I tend to be a fiercely independently-minded wine buyer and I only seek out wines you do on the show if it sounds like something I would be into based on the tasting notes, the latest example being CDP, which I really enjoyed by the way.
June 4, 2007

Aaron
Keep the show as is… I like to see your expressions knowing you are being honest and caught as off-guard as we are Gary V-dawg.
June 4, 2007

Colin Nicol
QOTD: Love the show the way it is and I would say keep it that way, but I wouldn’t see a problem with throwing in a show like that maybe once a week. I think that would be a good way of meeting everybodies requests.
June 4, 2007

Autoproxy
Wines you haven’t tasted at all is better…I like knowing that you are unscripted and reacting immediately, instead of knowing ahead of time various things you like about wines you’d select based on your liking them. I think that’s over 50% of the enjoyment of watching your reactions instead of just reading a list somewhere on your picks.
June 4, 2007

john maki
Gary,
The format overall is good and I wouldn’t change a thing – but you know what! You could add a little segment for the crowd that’s asking for it &
I think it could be good. Some ideas:
1: Add a recomended wine of the day – for whatever reason – it’s good, it’s different, it’s value, it’s hot in the market, you tasted it and loved it, etc. You could even taste and comment on it.
2: You could just list some recommendations when you have them – even a list of several or more at times – of your recommendations, wines you really like.
3: You could throw out some wines that you think people should taste and ask for evaluations &/or ratings and get some dialogue going (wines that are easily available) and then taste them on air with a discussion of why they are rated the way they are and how you think they fit in the market! People could vote on them ahead of time like voting for videos with some tabulation.
Maybe even a taste off of several wines!
Well you get the idea!
john
June 4, 2007

graz
My personal preference is for you to continue to suprise yourself. And in turn we the viewers are able to vicariously discover unexplored or seemingly new flavor profiles, with the element of spontaneity. Otherwise, it would seem that your offerings would more directly mirror what your warehouse inventory dictates.
June 4, 2007

Marc
QOTD: Gary, you’ve got me completely whipped. I actually want whatever you want.
June 4, 2007

PeteC
Hope your tasting some exciting Greek wines on vacation. Good “old world” stuff there. Keep it new for you, too, Gary, on the show.
June 4, 2007

MossyMo
GV, Another great episode. I’d like you to continue the show the way it is and maybe every 10 episodes toss in one where you recommend the wines and have tasted them first. BTW, the Sarah’s Blend sounds a bit like the Layer Cake…if I were a Brit I’d call it Plonk!

Later…
June 4, 2007

Justmarsh
Hahahaha…

QOD: Don’t. I think the episodes might become dull if you’ve tasted everything already. I love that you do the show on the fly and I think that’s how we get all these crazy, awesome tastings. With that said, maybe you should feature pre-tasted wines like you feature viewer questions. It’d be an interesting segment of the show, just don’t do the whole show that way. You should just have a suggestion or two from what you’ve tasted recently at the end of the show. Don’t re-taste them, just a comment /w text.
June 4, 2007

goldencoop
qotd – keep on keepin’ on. It’s a lot of fun to watch you go through the process.

BTW, I agree with what you said about the Marquis Phillips. Way overdone. Keep it up and thanks. You are now a part of my daily routine.
June 4, 2007

Mike Hale
QOTD – don’t change a thing … I think it is much more interesting for you to discover ones with us rather than tell us what wines you already like.
June 4, 2007

Ninjaneer
Relatively new to the show and this is my first post – just to say you shouldn’t change it! It’s much more real when you are surprised by the wine and give a real take on what you think. Great show though.
June 4, 2007

Domer99
GV-

I thought the Trevor Jones was unoaked – an unspoiled “virgin”. Where did the Oak Monster come from?

D99
June 4, 2007

Angie
QOTD–keep things as they are…but throw in a recommendation once in a while.
June 4, 2007

portman
As always, a great informative ep.

A good mix of wines today. Always looking for labels on your shows that i can find in the barren winelands of Maine.

Nice appearance from your dad. Spontaneous. What did you do to the birds? I don’t hear them chirping in the background lately. Had a BBQ did you?

QOTD: reading the earlier comments and it’s clear that the majority want you “to keep it the same”. The way I see it, the same would be most episodes like you did for today, the occasional Friday couch, the occasional stacked lineup of prior sampled wines, the occasional guest, off site ep’s like Bordeaux and London, once a blue moon blind tastings, and so on and so on.

Sounds like a great mix to me.

Keep up the great work. We are becoming believers.

Mike
June 4, 2007

Montrose
QOTD: It would be a grave injustice to the entire wine world to change the format of the show. It is fine to change the wine world, but why tinker with what is working so well?
June 4, 2007

Bossman
Dude,

Forget the laptop, forget the email, the store, the comments, Cork’d, Twizzler/Twither or whatever the heck it’s called. Relax, regenerate, revitalize and re-energize for gosh sake you’re on vacation. It isn’t going anywhere and you’re not missing anything you can’t catch up on. The taping of 12 shows was going above and bbeyond any reasonable expectation.

Threw me for a loop there, the “Sarah’s blend” link leads to Cork’d instead of the WL page, redundant in that there is a Cork’d link to the right. I like to click into WL and put wines you’ve piqued my interest in into the cart for my next purchase. No biggie this time given your take on the wine (ha ha) although I was “seeking” it out on my visit to WL on Memorial day and it wasn’t on the shelf which, in retrospect, is a good thing.

Also, you might want to reconsider the whole Winezap link on the buy it button in Cork’d. Given the value-added provided by your reviews on WLTV and Cork’d and the fact your prices are among the best anyway you don’t need to steer people to the competition. Frankly I wouldn’t mind paying a little more for all the steering to and from once one understands your palates relation to one’s own.

QOTD: Straddling the fence (doesn’t on the fence mean undecided anymore?), once every two weeks or so do a show on what struck you (good or bad) to illustrate a specific point you’re making but the rest of the time don’t change a thing from current format. If it ain’t broke….
June 4, 2007

Dave Canada
Can’t agree with you on there being a place for wines like that Marquis Phillips. If I want 16% alcohol, I’ll drink Amarone….there is way too much shit going one (ie over extraction, 100% new oak, limited selection of grapes) for those types of wine to be enjoyable. I drink one glass and am smashed both by the alcohol and the five alive….not for me…..
QOTD – I say you mix it up Gary….sometime it would be nice for you to do a show about wine you tasted where you stick you face right up against the lense and say “BUY THIS OR YOU ARE STUPID SHIT!” Just my two cents
June 4, 2007

Jon K
QOTD: Stick with status quo, but throw in something you want to share now and then.
June 4, 2007

ecola
QOTD: Taste the things you haven’t had before, it keeps the show exciting. Every once in a while do an episide for value, then the next day change it up. You do a great job keeping the show fresh, and I’ve already learned so much.
June 4, 2007

cosmo108
Keep the show as it is.
June 4, 2007

Denise W
I’m on the fence… I would love to hear some of your favorites and recommendations, but the mystery- seeing your facial expressions and hearing your off-the-cuff comments when you taste a wine for the first time- is what makes this show priceless. Mix it up!
June 4, 2007

John Witherspoon
Hey Gary V
Hope Venice is rockin’, I will be there later this month after I visit the Piemonte region.

QOTD: Keep the show as is, especially now that you are hooked up with cork’d, we can see your drinking ratings that way as long as you keep it up to date.

SEe ya
J DUB
June 4, 2007

Ole Ole
Welcome back, Gary, kalimera.

QOTD: Fresh tastings, element of surprise, that’s the ticket. More than that… please please do some BLIND TASTING on WLTV. Eric will cover up the bottles and you’ll have to taste them, then uncover at the end. I always fall off on the adventure side of the fence (once I started climbing).

Now and then do a pair-off, more competitive. Like, “old world Merlot” versus “New World Merlot” or orginal French Rhone blend versus “New World Rhone blend”. Or $12 Aussie Shirazs against $12 American Shiraz (North or South)… and do that in blind tasting. Oh, Vayniacs, this will take us to episode 1000, easy.
June 4, 2007

Bobinnati
QOTD – keep doing what you are doing. I like the unrehearsed aspect of it. It is like sitting down in a friend’s kitchen and tasting wine together without knowing what to expect.
June 4, 2007

Atreyu
Gary,
keep the show as you are doing it, but every now and then throw in an episode of recommended value wines.

Have a good trip!
June 4, 2007

Bobinnati
Oh yeah – the place where pre-tasting might come in handy is when you have guests from a winery. If you don’t know what you’re getting and you taste a real clunker, you might not want to embarrass your guests by being brutally honest. I will reiterate a suggestion that I remember from someone else that the way around this would be to taste all of the potential offerings from that winery and only re-taste those that you truly liked on the show. That way, you don’t have to be tough on your guests and we get to see the wines you really believe to be worth the effort.
June 4, 2007

MarkT
Why not mix it up a bit? It might not be bad to have an episode now and then of “Gary’s Picks”.
June 4, 2007

Greg B.
Big G. Love the episode. I’m looking forward to that Silverado Merlot. QOTD. Do not, Do not, change a thing about the show I love. The Show brings the thunder just the way it is. The people who write to will just have to match up their tastes with yours and then they will know if they will enjoy a Wine that you recommend.
Keep Killing it Big G.
June 4, 2007

GregS
QOTD: I love the show as it is, however, I can also see value in dedicating something like an episode per week towards recommendations (maybe based on requested themes). This would provide a useful service to viewers looking to buy wines.

Oh, and by the way, why have all of the “Gary V’s picks” on the main page become nothing but premium priced wines (averaging almost $50 per bottle). Come on throw some value priced bones!
June 4, 2007

TommyBoBo of WI
Keep it the way it is…..BUT
Maybe add some extra BLIND tastings,
Every couple months have a week of GUESTS,, winemakers, Vayniacs????
Selfishly….. I just want to be able to come home at night and before bed, sit and watch a little WLTV,,, learn something and be entertained,,, Is that ASKING all that much?????
Hope you are having a great trip,,,, I’m off to another exotic land, like you….. CANADA!!! in pursuit of Wally Walleye!
June 4, 2007

sweaver
You already have a pretty good track record of mixing things up. When you do a theme-based show perhaps you could highlight one wine that you feel truly represents the theme in an outstanding way. The basic format of the show however should stay the same – that is constantly shifting focus all around the wine world so we can change all of it.
June 4, 2007

JustinL
QOTD: Definitely keep the format as is. I think that if you go into tastings with a lot of pre-conceived notions about the outcome, it’s going to cloud your judgement and ruin the spontanaeity of the show. I love it when you a genuinely surprised by a wine.
June 4, 2007

BobMac
I like the idea of the occasional blind test…
June 4, 2007

Nathan L
QOD: As is dude. I like to see wines that aren’t great too. There have been many times you tasted wines I was interested in and you panned them. I also like to see your natural reaction and the enthusiams you have when you make a new find. PLEASE keep the format the same
June 4, 2007

laposte
My $0.02

QOTD,
I enjoy the current format other than when you go on vacation and feel obligated to tape twelve shows in one dayâ€¦guilt raises its ugly head. Perhaps you could just do a one or two wines/show. Also I love the wine and cheese pairing episodesâ€¦but whatâ€™s with this watching your cholesterol thing anywayâ€¦weâ€™re mammals if we donâ€™t consume it we produce itâ€¦right
June 4, 2007

Doc Dan
Keep it up O’ wine GOD! I enjoy comparing your first impressions with my own.
June 4, 2007

stewart l
QOD- I like the way things are run presently. I wouldn’t chanfge it.
June 4, 2007

caleb
keep it as is gary, unless you want to be a ‘parker’ to people forming their tastes. I like what you do now because you teach everyone to explore and find what they like rather than what you like. Yes people can still buy what you reccomend, but it isnt force fed in the current format which it might be in the other format. I think the way you do it now shows us what its all about exploration, good and bad
June 4, 2007

EdKoo
QOTD: Don’t change a thing. I actually watch the show more for the wines you rip apart. It entertains me.
June 4, 2007

ktw
love that daddy vaynerchuk’s nickname is “poopie” and that he is doing the LA thing with Sofitel-style!
QOTD-keep the format the same with a very occasional episode on wine that you have tasted and that surprized you (like the carlos russi jug episode)
June 4, 2007

Garret Nagle
QOTD: As helpful as it is to be aware of great buys, I also like knowing wines I should not buy. That being said, I think it might be a good idea to try selecting wines you’ve tasted for “Laid Back Friday” perhaps.
June 4, 2007

dkeck
Gary

I like your show soo much that I watch at least three old shows a night, keep it coming.

QOTD: Dedicate a whole web page to education of new guys like me, who are dieing for knowledge. You haved done some shows in the past, but how about 100 times more. I am sure you can use some of your Bordaux tape to educate us new ones where the real value is in Bordaux.
June 4, 2007

Christoph
QOTD: Why can’t we have both? Five shows a week leaves you plenty of opportunity. Majority of shows should be off the cuff as that what wine library tv is all about, but if you taste great things, why not share those with us as well on an occasional basis?
June 4, 2007

Jerry the 2THDR
QOTD: Don’t change the format. I like it when you are candid and haven’t preplanned what you are going to say. You have helped me amass a collection of wine that I will be looking forward to drinking for the next ten years. My son has promised to take up the slak if I can’t drink it all. 2thdr
June 4, 2007

NathanN
Keep trying wines you havenâ€™t had before. The show wouldnâ€™t have the same energy if you were tasting wine that you have had before except if it was something that you were excited about. Please do another double blind tasting. My wife still doesnâ€™t believe the last one.

Happy Travels
June 4, 2007

Don
QOTD: Keep doing the show the way you’re doing it.
June 4, 2007

wm mole
I agree with you caleb but would also like to see a shamelessly commercial “home shopping network version” as well. The free content here has great QPR. Make some $ to buy a jets suite!
June 4, 2007

cpd
I like the current format, but wouldn’t mind a “once every two week” or so show where you show us your favs. Either way, WLTV is my favorite!
June 4, 2007

KW
Gary, your current format is good. Occasionally, it may be good to give a “known” perspective – provides a little change and keeps the audience guessing.

This episode was good because all the wines were consistent in either the “expert” rating and very closely priced. It is hard to compare wines when the price points are far apart.

The shows where you bring out a dozen or so wines to taste – those rock!
June 4, 2007

R Freed
First time poster after a month of lurking around here…

I have found that the Marquis Philips wines need a certain amount of age before really being something that I can appreciate, particularly with the “heat” that I sense from such high alcohol levels. I remember trying their ‘02 shiraz–hating it on day 1, thinking I may have misjudged it on day 2 and actually really liking a bottle that had been opened 2 days earlier. I think it’s drinking great now out of the bottle…

I’ll have to try that Silverado merlot.
June 4, 2007

David M
Top 157!!!

I like not knowing what you will think of each wine. I would lose interest if the show was predictable.
June 5, 2007

David Grega (CMBTvet)
GV! It’s me Dave…dude…why fix it if it aint broke?! keep doing what you do best….i know you love people and all…but think about it…you started this thing because “YOU” wanted to connect with people and get to know them, not some fake version of you or a version that people say they want to see….no not at all….one of the things I respect you for the most is how real you are….you were not afraid to give your honest opinion to the dudes at the SF meet even though you knew they might not all want to hear what you had to say about CA wines….that’s real man and that’s why I watch your show…so keep it real bro…cuz this show is really about you….putting yourself and your honest opinions out there…those that care will be loyal and those that don’t will fizzle out….i’m with ya though man…out
June 5, 2007

nougat
OK, here comes some sarcasm:

Gary, please do shows were you open bottles of wine that you’ve already tasted, because I think it would be interesting to watch you take a sip and say “oh yeah, I already tried this and I still like it”. That would be really intriguing, episode after episode.

Don’t change it Gary, not even on Fridays.
June 5, 2007

A
QOTD: Please do not change from your current method of selecting wines. But, it’s OK to have a show every now and then where you share a few wines with us that you are already excited about.
June 5, 2007

Sean S
I would love to see you profile some pre-tasted stuff, but only on occasion. The spontanaeity of your show is why I watch, so don’t mess up a great thing.
June 5, 2007

PeterLitton
QOTD: Keep the current format. It’s like we’re there with you. If it’s predictable you’ll come across as more preaching–which any talking head can do. And it’s fun seeing you pan a highly rated wine.
June 5, 2007

Jen
I’ve been working on my novel “Keifer, Keith, and Gary; the Real Men in My World.” It’s going well…. Flipping the switch with Marquis Phillips; priceless…
QOTD: I like you tastin gwines for the first time. Lovin’ that off the cuff component.
June 5, 2007

mikeyrad
QOTD: Both might be fun, but I do like the current format because of the spontaneity.
June 5, 2007

Larry
It is far more interesting to explore these new wines with you. Your style and your off the cuff, unconsidered and unbiased reactions are what makes watching these episodes SO much fun. A little bit of you . . .
June 5, 2007

Chriswalkenrules
I am on the taste new wines side of the fence. Spontaneous reactions are what we want. Gary, don’t go both ways, this format works. Tony Romo for president.
June 5, 2007

Pablo
QOTD: I think a lot of people would like to know what you have been drinking and what you think of it, and there is cork’d for that, but perhaps on occasion you could throw in a wine you have already had recently, so we can see your reaction to it etc.

Personally though, I love it when you slam a wine =) Keep the drama happening!
June 5, 2007

clouder
QOTD: I say mix it up and do a little of both, look at the response and do more or less of it. Just like we shouldn’t be on the side of old or new world wines, we should be fans of one given format. Need to explore and try new things to appreciate what we got or to see what we’re missing out on.
June 5, 2007

Andrew Zander
QOTD: Over all, I prefer to see the initial, raw reaction that goes with tasting wine for the first time. However, if a really special wine comes along and you feel it deserves to be shared with us Vayniacs, by all means taste it again on the show; I’m sure you won’t mind
June 5, 2007

Joel Bombardier
Gary-

pleasae continue in your traditional stlye for Wine Library TV. This show has brought me much joy over the last months and I love how it is. Thank you, and please — don’t stop.

+ Joel
June 5, 2007

Elliot
QOTD: Keep doin what you’re doin man. Personally, I enjoy finding out what wines you think are awful just as much as I enjoy finding out which ones you dig. You dig?

– Elliot
June 5, 2007

Darlene O.
Gary, love the episode!! OK, here’s the deal. If you are tasting a wine you’ve already tasted that you’re recommending, it’s very linear. All we’re getting are the wines you like. When you’re tasting blind, not knowing the outcome, not only are you educating the masses on that particular wine ‘as is’, but your tasting is a surprise to all, and THAT’S ENTERTAINMENT!!!!!! You end up critiquing the wine overall, whether you like it or not, and that’s much more educational in the long run. Just my 2 cents…
June 5, 2007

Jim Wilkerson
QOTD: I’ll add to what seems to be the consensus – Keep as is.

Several reasons:

1. It’s more educational to see a wider range of quality. If everything is “awesome color, explosive nose, clean fruit, good structure, nice balance — this is a 90-point wine” what are we learning?
2. It’s more fun. I play a little game as I’m watching: Guess GV’s score based on the face he makes while swishing the wine around his mouth (before he pulls his head out of the Jets spit-bucket). I’ve gotten pretty good at it. I was dead-on for the first 3 wines tonight, but off by 2 points on Marquis Philips.
3. How much wine do you have to drink to need multiple bottles recommended by Gary every day of the week?! That’s asking a lot. Over the course of any given week, I always feel like I’ve gotten several good recommendations among the 15-20 wines he’s tasted, and that’s plenty for me.

I’ll also add that I love the blind tasting episodes and would enjoy seeing them more often.

Keep up the great work, Gary!
June 5, 2007

wine-ot
QOD – Love the exploration of new wines live/semi-live…. But keep us in the loop if you find some sleepers. And I don’t mind spending $ just has to be justified…Thanks gary, chao!
June 5, 2007

vibemore
GV- As long as you keep bringing the good deals and the thunder I don’t care how you do it. Don’t get me wrong, I DO care.

I hope you’re enjoying Venice. It has been 15 years since my one and only trip there.
June 5, 2007

alex
I still have no idea what those numbers on the board are.?
June 5, 2007

Bryan
I like the fact that the outcome is not assured – I’d rather you step on wine bottle shaped landmine than me . I also agree with a lot of Jim Wilkerson’s points above.

That being said, I can see the value of maybe the occasional episode where you would outright recommend something – maybe some insight as to what your daily drinkers are, etc.
June 5, 2007

Panoca
The current format is spectacular. Variety, regions, varietals, prices, etc along with the best wine tasting maestro, is what makes this show so special.
I would like to see more blind tasting tough…
Keep up the amazing work!
June 5, 2007

YoungDave
QOTD: Ok, BIG G.- I can’t lie. I appreciate your oppinion about wines that you have tried, like, and then re-taste and rate on the show. HOWEVER- your honestly and on-the-spot evaluation is what keeps this whole show from being just another marketing tool for your store. So, although it seems obvious to suggest and maybe I’m copping out on which side of the fence I lie, maybe you should taste 2 of the four daily wines for the first time along with 2 that you have had before and either like or DON’T like to show what you dislike about a certain popular wine within the category of the day’s episode.
…But if I have to give you a “one-or-the-other” answer, I climbed up the fence from the “first-time tasted wines” side, and had to jump back down because of the barbed wire at the top. If I have to chose, I’ll go with your honesty on wines you’ve never tasted for my WL episodes, and look to your Cork’d wine journal for the ones you’ve liked recently.

Keep it real.
- YoungD.
June 5, 2007

KC DAN
Keep it the same G , doing only wines you already had may make it a little to fake or sugarfied . Some of your first reactions on a wine you never had are priceless . Like some others said maybe once a week do some wines you had recently and liked . Thanks for all you do .
June 5, 2007

Mike Palmason
I like the way you’re currently doing the show. Its fun not knowing how you will react.

Thanks Gary!!!
June 5, 2007

Christian K
First time commenter!

QOTD: Love the current format! Very interesting and great. However, once every week or two, it would be nice to have a G’s picks show. OR even better… Wines you HATED, a “beware” show. Also fun to watch I expect.
June 5, 2007

Ferrigno
BESIDES, if you change the format we all will end up buying the same stuff and NOT CHANGING the wine world :S, so, keep it as it is!!

PS: thank you for leaving taped episodes while you’re gone… i LOVE to see this kind of effort
June 5, 2007

Joseph M. Kennedy
QOTD: For the most part, I like the way the show is already, but, that being said, a show every now and then with a wine that you liked and would recommend would be nice. DON’T CHANGE THE SHOW, but special episodes would be cool.
June 5, 2007

Kathleen Lisson
Gary,
I like the show like it is now, if people want to know which wines we like, they can peruse our corkd profiles!

Here is my corkd profile:
http://corkd.com/people/gamay

If anyone wants to see the power of corkd on the wine world, do a search for Rkatsitelli on Google. Luckily, Dr. Franks’ Rkatsitelli is one of my favorite wines, because my profile of it is in the #1 spot.
Kathleen
June 5, 2007

Kathleen Lisson
Gary,
I loved the live call in from your dad! And you must have had him in the back of your mind, because I can’t remember ever seeing you give a wine the ‘I’m disappointed in you’ look that -my- father has down pat.
“Now, sonny, you know that fruity Hi-C punch aroma isn’t the best you can do.”
Perfect subliminal reminder to everyone to get those Father’s Day cards out!
Kathleen
Albany, NY

Wine and Stories from the Vineyard Blog – http://www.myspace.com/gamay
June 5, 2007

Rick McQ
Gary: I like the current format because it keeps it/YOU fresh. Maybe on Fridays you could pick grapes or regions that are not popular. I’m a big fan of Barolo’s from Piedmont and always drank red. I just broke out and tried Gavi. I also tried Erbaluce from Italy from Ferrando, which I thought was very good.
June 5, 2007

Andy
Great ep G —- Keep up the good work … Don’t change a thing. Appreciate your honesty and humor in the wine world.
June 5, 2007

kevin
qotd. i am on the side of the fence that says keep doing it the way you are doing it.
June 5, 2007

DMG
QOTD: I’m on both sides of the fence. Mix it up, you’re doing a great job!
June 5, 2007

eugene
Gary,
Could you make similar episode with more of a old world value wines?
It is easy nowadays to pick a fruit bomb with 90 rating.

QOTD:

Leave it the way it is now.
If you bring to the show the wines that really impressed you, pretend you taste them for the first time!
June 5, 2007

Lynne
Gary, I loved VaynerPop’s phone call. You’re blessed to still have your parents. I lost my Mom early in her life, 10 years ago, and still had a lot to learn from her.

QOD: I love the show the way it is. It might be cool if somehow, we could know in enough time what wines you are tasting, so we could get our own and taste along with you. I learned so much in Chicago from doing just that. Kind of like the WOTM on the forums.
June 5, 2007

Lynne
Gary, I loved VaynerPop’s phone call. You’re blessed to still have your parents. I lost my Mom early in her life, 10 years ago, and still had a lot to learn from her.

QOD: I love the show the way it is. It might be cool if somehow, once in awhile, we could know in advance what wines you are tasting so we could get our own and taste along with you. I learned so much in Chicago from doing just that. Kind of like the WOTM on the forums.
June 5, 2007

Robert F
I think one of the best parts about WLTV is that even though we’re not ACTUALLY tasting with you, it’s like we’re discovering things together. It’s a lot more dynamic that way. With the new cork’d integration, we can just look at your wine journal to see what you’ve liked “behind the scenes”. Besides, I learn just as much from wines you bash as from the wines you like, if not more. So, as far as what side of the fence I’ve fallen on, I suppose I never even tried climbing it in the first place. Keep it the way it is!!!
June 5, 2007

Lynne
oooopps…didn’t mean to do that!
June 5, 2007

Medo
Greeting to your Dad Gary – Nice show again! When you tape 12 episodes on one day just feel free to some daily work during the show like ironing or shaving

QOTD: Keep it like it is!
June 5, 2007

italianwinelover
Great show once again…totally addicted! Like the show the way it is….even though I’m not tasting it with you feel like the experience is there first hand!! Keep it the same….love you just the way you are! Hope your enjoying your wonderful time off…..can’t wait for the next one!!
June 5, 2007

Jameus
Great show today man! I’ve had that bottle of sara’s blend in my hands a few times but never actually purchased it… Not sure I will now I thought there’d be more to it really.

QOD: I really do like your inside scoop on wines you’re retasting but your initial reactions to new wines really is priceless! That’s the exact same thing that everyone else goes through when they bring that bottle home from the store and start the whole open/decant/wait ritual. You never know for certain what that particular wine will present like and that’s half the fun! So when you go through the exact same thing, it just helps US relate more to YOU imo. That and if I really want to know what ya think of wines you’ve tried I’ll check your cork’d out
June 5, 2007

Ken B.
Gary,

Enjoyed the show and the call from your Dad was great. My father passed away last March after a long battle with cancer; so savor every moment.

QOTD: It ain’t broke, so don’t fix it. I like the show the way it is, but like many other viewers, if you want to throw in some wines you’ve tasted already, that’s fine by me.

Hope your trip is going well.

Ken B.
June 5, 2007

Justcot
QOTD: I think that doing both is a great idea as long as you make it very clear that a recommendation is not something you are tasting for the first time. You could even do a show in the same format as now then at the end of the show give a few other recommendations that you enjoy that fit the theme.
June 5, 2007

Halden
QOTD: Leave the show as is. I like the honesty of first tastes. As for Recommendations of wines you have had I like to check your corkd account.
June 5, 2007

Rob B.
I like how you currently do the shows. It is particularly good when you fiind a really good or really bad wine and we get to see your reaction to those.
June 5, 2007

Grasshopper
Sensei,

Say hello to my friends Jon and Patti, they were in Venice yesterday as well…

QOTD – keep format the same, but you could have a recommneded wine of the day or week. That being a wine you tasted or drank outside of the show and recommend. I really like your reactions to wines you have not drank before, but also value your opinion and a wine of day or week woulod be nice addtiion.

Travel safe!

Grasshopper
June 5, 2007

ChadD.
I’ve found that just about every “90 point wine” episode you do, you always disagree. You only liked the Merlot-I know, I’m one of those ignorant “avoid merlot” types-I just need to drink a few good ones. Hey, do what ever you want, I’ll watch it anyway, but for the most part I do enjoy the episodes where you have not tasted the wine. Sometimes you are surprised and really get into a new find, or you pan them “cause you’d pan your own grandmother”.
June 5, 2007

Gravisman
I like WLTV the way it is….I don’t need you to recommend wines to me which I probably won’t be able to find anyway. I like to watch the tasting process which I can relate to, learn from, and enjoy.
June 5, 2007

Ryan D
QOTD: I wouldn’t change a thing. Every now and then, do a Gary’s Recommendations show but honestly if it wasn’t nothing but wines you LIKED, it would get boring!
June 5, 2007

Bettina
Hey Gary, great show. will have to search out Silverado again. kinda forgot about them…

pls. keep the show ‘as is’… it ain’t broke. don’t fix it.

see u again whenever you come back around Cali.
June 5, 2007

haz008
QOTD: I enjoy the show as it is so if it’s one or the other; stay the course because if you don’t we would lose the classic “Voga” types moments that I love so much. However, what about if you were to combine the ideas? For example, have a show on…Argentinian wines where you try 3 wines that you haven’t had before and recommened on that you know enjoy.
June 5, 2007

Acousticdoc
QOTD: I think “Wines you recommend” would be a great single show topic, but you NEED to keep the same format. I love seeing you pan a wine that people have said they loved, or get that suprised Vayernod going from an unexpected underdog. Keep it up!!
June 5, 2007

RieslingRon
QOTD: I’m on your side of the fence GV……Keep the format as is with wines that you have not tried recently. Sprinkle in a recommendations show every now and then is OK.

Wine Library TV is still an awesome endeavor…….keep up the good work..

I enjoy every episode…Thanks.
June 5, 2007

Shad
QOTD:Don’t change a thing. What you have going now works. Sure, toss in an episode where you have tried the wines every now and then. I have watched a lot of episodes in the last few weeks while being a lurker trying to get an idea where the show has evolved from and becoming informed. Now that I have come out from the dark and into the light I say leave things as they are. WLTV is fantastic!!
June 5, 2007

Lurkerdog
If the fence ain’t broke don’t try to fix it. I prefer the existing format. Although perhaps it worth a try to occasionally mix it up and do a show of wines you have previously tasted and scored.
June 5, 2007

Lurkerdog
Also I suggest lunch at the Danielli overlooking the Grand Canal. Its awesome!
June 5, 2007

Alexander Levitan
I’m among phillistines here in Minnesota. What do I have to do to be able to buy wine from you?
AL
June 5, 2007

Sassodoro
QOTD: I like the format as it is, but it wouldn’t hurt to do wines you recommend once in a while. On the one hand, it’s fun to watch you separate the wheat from the chaff, and I learn from watching you do it and hearing your reasons and deciding whether I agree. On the other hand, I’m also looking for good value wines to buy, and you taste a lot more wines than I do, so your recommendations would help me zero in on stuff I should be considering. On the other hand… Oops! Sorry, I’m out of hands.
June 5, 2007

Rich F
Keep the current format!
If on occasion you wish to show something that you recently had and liked, ok, included it.
June 5, 2007

luvgrapesqeezings
QOD: Perhaps you’re better off mostly tasting wines that you’ve never tasted. If you taste mostly or all wines that you’ve had in the recent past, then you should carefullly consider the criteria for selection. I’m sure that some wineries that have been rated under expectation would just love to see such a change because the show could become a platform for what you want to promote.

The current approach not only calls for your frankness about wine, but also helps educate the public about a wide range of wines and wine characteristics that may not get the same air time as only ones that the critic would recommend.
June 5, 2007

anthony bruno
great show please send a wristband and i WILL send a cool picture with it .
June 5, 2007

camanoman
Current format is great, but it wouldn’t hurt to throw in an episode once in a while highlighting your favorites. You have worlds of experience, old and new, that is, and I for one would like to see what Gary considers his favorites once in a while. Just don’t get carried away with yourself!
June 5, 2007

Justin S
My .02; Thank God for the rain in south GA!

QOTD: How about 3 wines you’ve never tasted along with 1 recommendation, then everyone will be happy.
June 5, 2007

Neil D
Gary, ‘you da man’

I’ll definitely seek out the Silverado, even though i’m an old world man . . .

Answer to the Question: I like your format, but maybe like three wines a week or one every other day throw in something you know and love with the new ones.
June 5, 2007

jason carey
drink wines you have never had,, if you are going to just reccommend wines you have tasted, that ruins the fun and suprise that you have when you taste them for the first time. That is what makes the show good, the suprise …
June 5, 2007

BruceP
QOTD. Just keep doing it the way you want to. That way you’e always interested and happy about the episode, and that’s an important factor to keep you doing it. And keep drinking all sorts of wines from obscure regions made from strange grapes. Yay for diversity.
June 5, 2007

cgf
QOTD:
keep mixing it up gary.

you have def had some nice eps where you have featured things you have tried before.

My favorite eps are when you focus on a region/varietal/theme, and not the 90 point themed eps. I have also liked the episodes where you feature wines with huge disparities in their scores between two major critics.

Keep up the great work!

Have a great time in Venice and drink some good prosecco.
June 5, 2007

Sangio
Current approach works – because us, with a lot of you are changing the wine world!!!
June 5, 2007

msb2ncsu
QOTD: Don’t change a thing. I have little reason to watch a 15-20 minute video when I already know the outcome. The unexpected highs and lows are what make this format entertaining. Besides, I find that “passes” are more beneficial than a positive recommendation. With the addition of your cork’d reviews on the side I think we get enough of a feel for what you are drinking and what you like.

Yet another video with wines that my current wine shop does not offer. Sucks.
June 5, 2007

TimInFL
86?…No body put baby in the corner!

Have fun!
June 5, 2007

cumpari
QOTD: Leave it alone. Everyone once in while a recommendation is OK. Too much of that can threaten WLTV becoming a program that more about sales and adverts than exploration. I prefer the latter.
June 5, 2007

Eags
I think you it’s cool if you mix it up – though I’d rather see you go in cold and try wines you haven’t had before. Would also be fun if you did an episode of wines that have blown you away and wanted to recommend and share? How’s that for lying on the top of the fence?

Question for you: Do you look at the Parker, Spectator, WE, ratings and descriptions before you taste the wines on WLTV?
June 5, 2007

sharon
As usual a fun and informative show…I’m running out to find the Silverado. But why the Sofitel plug? There are better places in L.A. to stay.
QOTD: either one is fine. I love the stand up “Belorussian” comic aspect of surprise and why not offer up suggestions? As long as it’s not just to empty the warehouse. This is just my opinion (my Humble Opinion) but I would like to know in advance what you will be tasting. Have fun in Bella Italia!
June 5, 2007

WML
Keep the same format, however….
perhaps introduce:
“My Wine Library Wednesdays” ….where on Wed’s we can expect to hear from you about wines you personally have tasted the past week….maybe use the current 4 bottle format….with an an additional 2 bottles at the end of the video…you don’t have to taste them, but keep the bottle for presentation and briefly tell us about it. I think it’s important to also add whether or not is is available to purchase and at what price. This will also boost your viewership in the middle of the week…hump Wed so to speak.
June 5, 2007

Bryght Wines
I hate Garnacha. But, I love Gary. Unknowingly, he’s been hosting many of my wine-tasting parties (via YouTube simulcast). I hope he doesn’t get mad.
June 5, 2007

drummerboy
great program! I’m officially hooked; my sommelier at work turned me on to you. Very cool and fun!
June 5, 2007

C-BusWineMofo
QOTD: I like the format of your show now, however I love when you did the sampler pack shows and would like to be apart of the next one.
June 5, 2007

EthanPSU
QOTD: I think I’m on the side of the fence where you keep the current format but I might have like one foot dangling over the other side. So that said if you occasionally brought in something that you’ve tasted that you would drink and shared it with that would be sweet too.

Hope the trip is great!
June 5, 2007

Lawrence Leichtman
Wow, what a ton of letters. Keep Gary happy everyone. I like the mix it up format for the most part and like to hear about new wines most of the time. I would occasionally like reviews of restaurant wine list wines because these are rarely ones that I buy and I eat out often enough at restaurants I have never been to to want to get some idea of what not to waste money on in a restaurant. I’m with Gary here on the fake CA, OZ, South American, and occaasional Spanish wines that are so over the top that they don’t taste at all like the grape they are made from or have no bearing on the region they’re from. I don’t think this divides Old World and New World just terroir or not. If you make a wine that is nothing more than a chemistry experiment is that wine or some other type of beverage resembling wine?
June 5, 2007

Lawrence Leichtman
Gravatar has disappeared again.
June 5, 2007

Cale
keep the show the same
June 5, 2007

Bart F
Gary,

I like the current format but am always open to new ideas. My 2 cents for the day!
June 5, 2007

Paul
QOTD: I prefer the way you do it now. Watching your immediate reaction to the wines you taste is part of the education and enjoyment of WLTV.

Good show. I feel exactly the same way about the Sarah’s – almost undrinkable for me.
June 5, 2007

Brad
Dude, you are killing me on the oak comments…Trevor Jones ‘virgin’ has no friggin’ oak, settle down my woodland friend!
June 5, 2007

Art Rose
I prefer the way you have been doing it. I like the spontaneity of your response to tasting the wines which would clearly be lost if you have recently tried them.
June 5, 2007

Art Rose
Ps. have a great tour.
June 5, 2007

Jim Wilkerson
RE: Brad’s post on the imaginary “oak monster” on the Trevor Jones Virgin Chard.

I’ve not tried this wine, but I know I’ve mistaken the aromas/flavors of lees contact for oak. Happened to me just the other night with Bertani Due Uve 2004. Good to know that even the pros can mix this up. I should trust my palate more.

Anyone else have trouble with this?
June 5, 2007

Ben Daniel
QOTD: Keep the frest tasting. It’s OK for you to recommend stuff from time to time, but I love watching your reaction to the wine. Keep up the good work!
June 5, 2007

Cooper
Chris is hotter than American Idol!
June 5, 2007

vivaitalia
Great to see so many people supporting keeping the show just as it is. The occasional recommendation is good. I’d really love to do a taste along episode. I know you did some sample pack ones back in the day but I wasn’t watching back then. I think that’s the height of interaction.
June 5, 2007

Hiram Richards
Great show and very informative it really helps me pick out some wines.
June 5, 2007

Steve Carter
QOTD: Would be cool to have an episode maybe once every few weeks or so where you followup on some things you had on your own that you found “profound”
June 5, 2007

Fran Benavidez
Great show! I like the current format. Maybe once a month do an “I recommend…” show. Although wine tasting is relative to the taster, Gary’s suggestions do carry quite a bit of weight. I know I tend to seek out many of his 90 pointers!
June 5, 2007

Clifford James
QOTD: I like what you have been doing, i.e. wines you’ve never tasted. HOWEVER, I can see the value in you showcasing wines you HAVE tasted and have loved, especially if they are at various price-points.

ALSO, I would really like to see more brown-bag (err, blind) tastings,a s these were informative, fascinating, and proved you really know your wines.

Hope you’re having a great time wherever you are right now as I write this, and also where you are when you read this!

Keep up what you do!
June 5, 2007

Jamie
It was great to meeting you at the SF party. Thanks for the tasting.
June 5, 2007

TimF
Third time is the charm.

Maybe shouldn’t be mentioning Namath on a drinking show.

What’s 24? Sounds catchy.

Nice phone cameo by pops.

I love oak in my whites, but not in my reds. Wonder why?

Please review more wines with boob jobs.

QOTD: Just pick the stuff you feel like.
June 5, 2007

Grapedigger
Great show G…

QOTD: How about a compromise?! Obviously we’re eager to get tips on excellent QPR wines. At the same time it’s more interesting and spontaneous to you if you taste and comment on wines that you’ve tasted for the first time. So here is my recommendation: How about doing, on the same episode, 2 new wines that you have not tasted before along with 2 wines that you’ve already tasted and you know that they are great (preferably QPR wines). In both cases, it’d be great to choose wines that are widely available.

Cheers,
Grapedigger – Montreal
June 5, 2007

Mark K_NJ
QOTD: I like the current format and seeing your honest reactions to the wines. While I can see a benefit to changing it up once and awhile, I’d recommend staying with what is and changing the wine world like that.

Great episode. Hope you’re enjoying Venice, St. Mark’s Square, fresh sardines at dinner and some good drinks at Harry’s Bar.
June 5, 2007

ChrisR
QOD: Well, you have already done eps like that where you feature wines you’ve been drinking and love..like the Godello ep. I think those are great signature eps. You should do both, but the regular format of the show (you tasting for the first time) should remain the key component.
June 6, 2007

Chris Fehnel
QOTD: Agreed with a lot of the sentiments already stated. Keep the show with current format, keep your Cork’d profile updated so we know whats what, and then let us know once and again if there is a wine you had personally that knocked your socks off.
June 6, 2007

tim
QOTD: Really love the show as it is, but I like the idea of a “Gary reccommends” component. I always enjoy the Friday couch shows, and that might be a spot to do the type of show you are talking abou. I wouldn’t even mind if you tied it in with some free shipping and tried to sell me some stuff!
June 6, 2007

Freddy
leave show as is
June 6, 2007

LeatherPalate
love the show the way it is…
More Double Blinds PLEASE!!
June 6, 2007

Kelldey
Nice show today, GV. QOTD: I think you should keep the show primarily the same with maybe a change-up every now and then. Perhaps a show of fabulous $12 and under wines that you KNOW are good would be useful.

Getting caught up, slowly but surely. Can you tell it’s a slow day at work?
K
June 6, 2007

Pete
I agree with Kelldey – primarily as you are doing today, with a few shows that recap your favorite affordable wines with the new perspective of your recent tastings.

Great show, keep up the great work!
June 7, 2007

tarheel17
Gary, I love the way you do the show now, without having tasted the wines before the show. Wine is a learning process, so who wants someone else (you) to do the learning for them? The same folks who read cliffnotes, that’s who!
(I’m a nerd. I always read the book.)
BTW, I had the marquis phillips the other night at a restaurant and the oak monster didn’t appear. The fake fruit, however, almost bowled me over. I just ran into my husband’s office to replay your tasting of that wine, and bragged that I gave it an 85, only one point off from yours! I have no idea why I’m bragging about that. But at least it gives me some indication as to where my palate is in relation to yours. Thanks a million for the edumacation!

Hope you’re loving Greece!
June 7, 2007

Dave C
I agree with ya Gar about the Silverado–good stuff from Napa. The 04 is just as good. YOU ROCK!!!!
June 7, 2007

wildebeest
I think David the CMBTvet said it best, but I’d just like to add that, if I remember correctly, you’ve been slipping recommendations in from time to time anyway, and I don’t mind at all. You made it very clear that you were familiar with the Corte Riva and the Charles Creek Miradero Merlots before you tasted them on the show, but there was nothing about your recommendation that sounded like a sales pitch. It seemed rather that you were just trying to share your enthusiasm and teach us something at the same time. In the case of those two great Merlots, I suspect that you wanted us to know that, despite Sideways, Merlot has plenty to offer. There’s nothing wrong with that. I like the show the way it is, and I wouldn’t want to see it devolve into “GV’s FAVs”. It would definitely hurt the show if you felt an obligation to regularly recommend wines you like. But, at the same time, if you’re itching to share something, by all means do so.
June 7, 2007

cali6buff
I love that you fielded a call from Dad. THat’s why this show rocks, it’s real. Much unlike reality tv.

QOTD: One thing I would love to see/know is the actula Wine Celler of GV on Corkd. I’m sure you have it somewhere.
June 7, 2007

Susan
Gary- Tell your Dad we all say Hi!!
I think you need to learn to multitask!!
Wink ! Wink!!
June 7, 2007

Matt the Lurker
QOTD – Force feed! Force feed! Force feed! And keep doing what you are doing. Do both. Throw in a bunch of other stuff too. Stir it all up. I do like WML’s idea of â€œMy Wine Library Wednesdaysâ€.
June 7, 2007

mas
Catching up after a long business trip … QOTD: I’ve no problem with how you are doing the show – you are hitting a lot of wines that I have never had and I find that very rewarding.
June 7, 2007

Ron Wallace
I have all Silverado Limited Reserve Cabs and they do drink well. The Merlot has been more problematic. The regular Cab is a good drink, too, especially where the wines is served to folks who are not wraped up in limited production high-dollar wines.
June 7, 2007

Dennis Cox
QOD: Leave the show as is. We get enough people pushing their particular wines. Also, we would never know about crappy wine. Why would Gary drink something that he knows he doesn’t like? We need to know the bad along with the good. Also, he may not like the wine, but he gives an honest description. Maybe I would like that style that he is not so fond of.

Gary, thanks for drinking the dreck, so we don’t have to.
June 7, 2007

Jeff
Gary, After the episode earlier this week, I’m a little bit afraid to win the contest and go to California with you.

QOTD: I love the variety that the show has now but if you had a show where you’ve had and liked the wines, that would be ok once in awhile. Mostly cause I enjoy seeing what you DON’T like as well as one’s you do.
June 7, 2007

Martijn
QOTD: I am interested in both. Please maintain a balance between wines you have never tried before and include the wines you have tried and liked. You have the opportunity to try so many more wines than the rest of us; I value such experience. As much as I respect and enjoy reading reviews by the layperson, a person like yourself has the unique benefit of having tried wines most people don’t have access to, expanding the depth and scale of your tasting experience. Ultimately however, I value the choice that makes you happiest. What keeps you excited and interested is what makes the show enjoyable for us to watch.
June 8, 2007

mcj
QOTD: I like how you’re doing it now, but I also wouldn’t mind if you slipped in the occasional outside recommendation.
June 9, 2007

Wine Lush
I like you tasting the wine for the first time, keep it real. No preconceptons! You can only rate them, it’s for us to decide if they are for us off of your comments. I would like to see more unique grapes, Sardinia, Canary Islands, Mexico, Greece etc. It’s all about educatiion! You’re rockin’ it Gary keep it up!!! I’d be over at Parker’s forum if I wanted someone to tell me what they think I should drink because they already had and liked it. Keep it real!
June 11, 2007

Michael H
QOTD: Keep the current format. It definitely keeps original, unbiased reactions coming in. Occasionally, if you drink a wine that really brings the thunder (and you don’t mind passing the info on to us), share that and your tasting commentary on the show — b/c it always helps trainees like us look for certain aromas on the nose and certain tastes on the palate…
June 11, 2007

MrTC
QOTD: Please please please keep the current format. Unless you’re very good at kidding everyone, I doubt that your excitement about tasting wines unknown to yourself could be replicated in a ‘Gary recommends’ type of show.
June 12, 2007

aaronT
keep it real. it helps to learn about ways a wine can “fail” before you really understand how other wines “succeed”
June 16, 2007

JayZee
QOTD: I guess I prefer the WLTV episodes where you have NOT tasted the wines. Frankly, it is kind of fun to watch you be surprised about how good a wine is or to go off on a rant about how bad a wine might be.
June 23, 2007

Nico
QOTD: I also prefer how you have been doing the episodes, where you also have no t tasted the wines. It’s especially cool when you focus in on a cool theme like you did with Brunellos

Rock on!
June 29, 2007

WPROC
I was able to try the 2005 Zabrin Atteca. The first GV reviewed wine I was able to find at my local wine shop. I could taste HiC grape juice to start, I wonder if that Gary could smell or thought was fake. I liked it, and thought Gary’s descriptions were close to what I could taste. The only thing is, I SHELLED OUT 18 BONES for this wine. 5-6 bucks more than what I could have ordered it for from Wine Library….whats up with that? Hey Gary, what kind of WWF choke hold you got on the the market?
August 10, 2007

Sam I
QOD: I like the format the way it is. That doesn’t mean a balance wouldn’t be nice and frankly I would like to see episodes that have no tasting at all involved but are purely educational about a varietal or region etc.
February 17, 2008

redfrog
GV – Obviously, going back through the old ones today. I absolutely prefer you tasting new wines for yourself. I think it adds a lot to the show when you find ones you don’t like. Sometimes a “NO” is just as good as a “Yes”. I think you should do the “Gary recommends” section on the Wine Library site.

Another great show, please keep pushing everyone to try new stuff!!
April 12, 2008

cheech
Dude , you remind me of howard stern but with the wine world and potentially bigger than him, okay you know that , anyway, thank you for the shows, you are doing a wonderful job, oh make the links much bigger to be able to join the monthly orders of your wines, peace and thanks,
Brett
April 19, 2008

Dantt
Trevor Jones Virgin Chardonnay:

I have always liked your show and trusted your palate. I am beginning to wonder if we are drinking the same wines.
Trevor jones – no oak, not sweet, great acidity, lots of citrus, a perfect wine with fresh seafood.

Regaleali Nero D Avola – Simple, pleasant, not up to snuff with it’s Nero competition but no off-scent or garbage nose.

Your unappreciation of over the top fruit bombs is not warranted. Take the 2005 Writers Block Lake County Zinfandel. Way over the top strawberry flavor, Yummy.
July 14, 2008

Dessert Wine Nerd
QOTD: Keep the show as it is. I like the unpredictable nature of the show. Most of the time you havent tried that exact wine, so its fun to see you gab about the winery and years past then dig into it. Though I must plead….More dessert wines!!!!
July 18, 2008

Rob
I’m sitting down with a bottle of 2003 Silverado Merlot tonight and I get a super strong cigar on the bouquet as well as the first flavors. Not sure if that’s just what another year of aging has done to it but it’s a tough flavor to miss. The finish is super smooth with hints of chocolate.

Here in NH it’s up to $29 but still well worth it.
June 3, 2009

looper
Wish I saw this live when you were giving out wristbands!!
June 24, 2009

Adrian
Keep the current format…..it’s better as no one knows how the outcome will be plus it is more interesting and fun.
June 30, 2009

Phredd
QOTD: A little late to weigh-in, but I just wanted to say I like the unknown format. Gives you a chance to say what you really think without as much preconception. Not that you’ve ever been afraid to speak your mind, it is just harder to review “against” yourself.
August 22, 2009

Mikeeeee
QOTD: I don’t oppose either, but favor the new wines. (new to you, they’re all new to me!)
November 6, 2009

dcpatton
QOTD: Either format works for me. However, have you considered doing more double-blind tastings to really mix it up?